Mus vs Sudan: Insufficiently active

Mus
82.2
in 2016
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Mus rank
1st
Sudan rank
4th

Insufficiently active over time

  • Mus
  • Sudan
020406080100200120082016

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 82.2 in Mus, a difference of 8.1.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Mus's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Mus ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 2 regions.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mus Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 83.97 89.57 5.6 Sudan
2010s 82.7 90.11 7.4 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher insufficiently active, Mus or Sudan?
Sudan, at 90.3 against 82.2 in Mus as of 2016.
What is the difference in insufficiently active between Mus and Sudan?
8.1, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do Mus and Sudan rank globally for insufficiently active?
Mus ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 2 regions.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mus vs Sudan: Insufficiently active. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/insufficiently-active-crude-estimate/mus-2/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/insufficiently-active-crude-estimate/mus-2/sudan/">Mus vs Sudan: Insufficiently active</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Insufficiently active (crude estimate)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
145 places, 2,320 data points, 2001–2016
Last refreshed