Morocco vs Namibia: Insufficiently active
Morocco
87.26
in 2016
Namibia
87.42
in 2016
Morocco rank
22nd
Namibia rank
20th
Insufficiently active over time
- Morocco
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 87.42 against 87.26 in Morocco, a difference of 0.16.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.51 | 87.29 | 0.7884 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 87.05 | 87.38 | 0.3292 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Morocco or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 87.42 against 87.26 in Morocco as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Morocco and Namibia?
- 0.16, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Morocco and Namibia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Morocco ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.