Mauritania vs Namibia: Insufficiently active
Mauritania
87.25
in 2016
Namibia
87.42
in 2016
Mauritania rank
23rd
Namibia rank
20th
Insufficiently active over time
- Mauritania
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 87.42 against 87.25 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.46 | 87.29 | 0.1643 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 87.31 | 87.38 | 0.0747 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Mauritania or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 87.42 against 87.25 in Mauritania as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Mauritania and Namibia?
- 0.17, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Mauritania ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.