Lower-middle income (World Bank) vs New Zealand: Insufficiently active
Lower-middle income (World Bank)
79.26
in 2016
New Zealand
88.74
in 2016
Lower-middle income (World Bank) rank
10th
New Zealand rank
9th
Insufficiently active over time
- Lower-middle income (World Bank)
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.74 against 79.26 in Lower-middle income (World Bank), a difference of 9.48.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Lower-middle income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 11 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower-middle income (World Bank) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.38 | 87.61 | 7.24 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 79.56 | 88.44 | 8.88 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Lower-middle income (World Bank) or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 88.74 against 79.26 in Lower-middle income (World Bank) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Lower-middle income (World Bank) and New Zealand?
- 9.48, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower-middle income (World Bank) and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Lower-middle income (World Bank) and New Zealand rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.