Low income (World Bank) vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
Low income (World Bank)
84.92
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
Low income (World Bank) rank
4th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 89.27 against 84.92 in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 4.35.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.23 | 88.68 | 3.45 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 85.01 | 89.11 | 4.1 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Low income (World Bank) or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 89.27 against 84.92 in Low income (World Bank) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Low income (World Bank) and Zambia?
- 4.35, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.