Libya vs Nepal: Insufficiently active
Libya
83.16
in 2016
Nepal
83.46
in 2016
Libya rank
81st
Nepal rank
78th
Insufficiently active over time
- Libya
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 83.46 against 83.16 in Libya, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 78th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.62 | 83.35 | 0.2705 | Libya |
| 2010s | 83.29 | 83.44 | 0.1507 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Libya or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 83.46 against 83.16 in Libya as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Libya and Nepal?
- 0.3, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nepal?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Libya and Nepal rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Libya ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 78th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.