Republic of Korea vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Republic of Korea
94.18
in 2016
Western Pacific (WHO region)
85.78
in 2016
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
2nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Republic of Korea
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 94.18 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 8.4.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.13 | 85.97 | 7.17 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 93.9 | 85.9 | 8.01 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Republic of Korea or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Republic of Korea, at 94.18 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Republic of Korea and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 8.4, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Republic of Korea and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.