Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Insufficiently active
Kiribati
82.47
in 2016
Saint Kitts and Nevis
82.28
in 2016
Kiribati rank
84th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th
Insufficiently active over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 82.47 against 82.28 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.19.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 132 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.31 | 83.02 | 0.2919 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 82.73 | 82.48 | 0.2415 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Kiribati or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Kiribati, at 82.47 against 82.28 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.19, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Kiribati ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.