Kiribati vs Mauritius: Insufficiently active
Kiribati
82.47
in 2016
Mauritius
82.2
in 2016
Kiribati rank
84th
Mauritius rank
86th
Insufficiently active over time
- Kiribati
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 82.47 against 82.2 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kiribati ranks 84th and Mauritius ranks 86th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.31 | 83.97 | 0.6537 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 82.73 | 82.7 | 0.0218 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Kiribati or Mauritius?
- Kiribati, at 82.47 against 82.2 in Mauritius as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Kiribati and Mauritius?
- 0.27, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Kiribati and Mauritius rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Kiribati ranks 84th and Mauritius ranks 86th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.