Kenya vs Nauru: Insufficiently active
Kenya
86.85
in 2016
Nauru
86.79
in 2016
Kenya rank
30th
Nauru rank
32nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Kenya
- Nauru
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 86.85 against 86.79 in Nauru, a difference of 0.06.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 30th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.92 | 86.68 | 0.2419 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 86.87 | 86.76 | 0.1042 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Kenya or Nauru?
- Kenya, at 86.85 against 86.79 in Nauru as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Kenya and Nauru?
- 0.06, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Kenya and Nauru rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Kenya ranks 30th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.