Jordan vs Sri Lanka: Insufficiently active
Jordan
84.78
in 2016
Sri Lanka
85.16
in 2016
Jordan rank
49th
Sri Lanka rank
46th
Insufficiently active over time
- Jordan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 85.16 against 84.78 in Jordan, a difference of 0.38.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 46th of 130 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.65 | 85.74 | 1.09 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 84.74 | 85.31 | 0.569 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Jordan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 85.16 against 84.78 in Jordan as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Jordan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.38, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Jordan and Sri Lanka rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Jordan ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 46th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.