Italy vs New Zealand: Insufficiently active
Italy
88.62
in 2016
New Zealand
88.74
in 2016
Italy rank
10th
New Zealand rank
9th
Insufficiently active over time
- Italy
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.74 against 88.62 in Italy, a difference of 0.12.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 132 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.2 | 87.61 | 0.4122 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 88.25 | 88.44 | 0.1867 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Italy or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 88.74 against 88.62 in Italy as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Italy and New Zealand?
- 0.12, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Italy and New Zealand rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Italy ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.