Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Insufficiently active
Indonesia
86.38
in 2016
Zimbabwe
86.64
in 2016
Indonesia rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Insufficiently active over time
- Indonesia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 86.64 against 86.38 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.26.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 132 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.21 | 86.78 | 0.5744 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 86.33 | 86.68 | 0.3436 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 86.64 against 86.38 in Indonesia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.26, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Indonesia ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.