Indonesia vs Nauru: Insufficiently active
Indonesia
86.38
in 2016
Nauru
86.79
in 2016
Indonesia rank
35th
Nauru rank
32nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Indonesia
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 86.79 against 86.38 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.41.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 35th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.21 | 86.68 | 0.4657 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 86.33 | 86.76 | 0.4289 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Indonesia or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 86.79 against 86.38 in Indonesia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Indonesia and Nauru?
- 0.41, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Indonesia and Nauru rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Indonesia ranks 35th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.