Iceland vs Malta: Insufficiently active
Iceland
80.28
in 2016
Malta
81.43
in 2016
Iceland rank
99th
Malta rank
96th
Insufficiently active over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 81.43 against 80.28 in Iceland, a difference of 1.15.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 99th and Malta ranks 96th of 132 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.81 | 81.31 | 0.497 | Malta |
| 2010s | 80.4 | 81.53 | 1.13 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Iceland or Malta?
- Malta, at 81.43 against 80.28 in Iceland as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Iceland and Malta?
- 1.15, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Iceland ranks 99th and Malta ranks 96th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.