Guatemala vs Nauru: Insufficiently active
Guatemala
86.91
in 2016
Nauru
86.79
in 2016
Guatemala rank
29th
Nauru rank
32nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Guatemala
- Nauru
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 86.91 against 86.79 in Nauru, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nauru ahead.
Guatemala ranks 29th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.4 | 86.68 | 0.2726 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 86.77 | 86.76 | 0.014 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Guatemala or Nauru?
- Guatemala, at 86.91 against 86.79 in Nauru as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Guatemala and Nauru?
- 0.12, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Nauru rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Guatemala ranks 29th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.