Ghana vs Namibia: Insufficiently active
Ghana
87.46
in 2016
Namibia
87.42
in 2016
Ghana rank
19th
Namibia rank
20th
Insufficiently active over time
- Ghana
- Namibia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 87.46 against 87.42 in Namibia, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Ghana ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.21 | 87.29 | 0.089 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 87.39 | 87.38 | 0.007 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Ghana or Namibia?
- Ghana, at 87.46 against 87.42 in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Ghana and Namibia?
- 0.04, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Ghana and Namibia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Ghana ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.