Fiji vs Nepal: Insufficiently active
Fiji
83.28
in 2016
Nepal
83.46
in 2016
Fiji rank
79th
Nepal rank
78th
Insufficiently active over time
- Fiji
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 83.46 against 83.28 in Fiji, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 78th of 132 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.93 | 83.35 | 0.5814 | Fiji |
| 2010s | 83.46 | 83.44 | 0.0261 | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Fiji or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 83.46 against 83.28 in Fiji as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Fiji and Nepal?
- 0.18, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Fiji ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 78th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.