Egypt vs Namibia: Insufficiently active
Egypt
87.48
in 2016
Namibia
87.42
in 2016
Egypt rank
18th
Namibia rank
20th
Insufficiently active over time
- Egypt
- Namibia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 87.48 against 87.42 in Namibia, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Egypt ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.29 | 87.29 | 0 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 87.43 | 87.38 | 0.0488 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Egypt or Namibia?
- Egypt, at 87.48 against 87.42 in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Egypt and Namibia?
- 0.06, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Egypt and Namibia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Egypt ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.