Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Insufficiently active
Ecuador
86.53
in 2016
Zimbabwe
86.64
in 2016
Ecuador rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Insufficiently active over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 86.64 against 86.53 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.11.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 132 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.33 | 86.78 | 0.455 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 86.47 | 86.68 | 0.202 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 86.64 against 86.53 in Ecuador as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 0.11, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Ecuador ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.