Ecuador vs Nauru: Insufficiently active
Ecuador
86.53
in 2016
Nauru
86.79
in 2016
Ecuador rank
34th
Nauru rank
32nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Ecuador
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 86.79 against 86.53 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.26.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.33 | 86.68 | 0.3463 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 86.47 | 86.76 | 0.2872 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Ecuador or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 86.79 against 86.53 in Ecuador as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Ecuador and Nauru?
- 0.26, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Ecuador and Nauru rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Ecuador ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.