Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) vs Sudan: Insufficiently active
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region)
87.02
in 2016
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) rank
1st
Sudan rank
4th
Insufficiently active over time
- Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region)
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 87.02 in Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region), a difference of 3.28.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 11 groups.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.45 | 89.57 | 3.12 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 86.86 | 90.11 | 3.25 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 87.02 in Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Sudan?
- 3.28, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Sudan rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.