Costa Rica vs Trinidad and Tobago: Insufficiently active
Costa Rica
82.01
in 2016
Trinidad and Tobago
82.15
in 2016
Costa Rica rank
91st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
88th
Insufficiently active over time
- Costa Rica
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 82.15 against 82.01 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.14.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 91st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 | 82.89 | 0.1139 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 82.29 | 82.35 | 0.0595 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Costa Rica or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 82.15 against 82.01 in Costa Rica as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.14, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Costa Rica ranks 91st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.