Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Insufficiently active
Costa Rica
82.01
in 2016
Tanzania
82.11
in 2016
Costa Rica rank
91st
Tanzania rank
89th
Insufficiently active over time
- Costa Rica
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 82.11 against 82.01 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 89th of 132 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 | 83.5 | 0.4931 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 82.29 | 82.49 | 0.1933 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Costa Rica or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 82.11 against 82.01 in Costa Rica as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Costa Rica and Tanzania?
- 0.1, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Costa Rica and Tanzania rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Costa Rica ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 89th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.