Costa Rica vs Maldives: Insufficiently active
Costa Rica
82.01
in 2016
Maldives
81.89
in 2016
Costa Rica rank
91st
Maldives rank
93rd
Insufficiently active over time
- Costa Rica
- Maldives
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 82.01 against 81.89 in Maldives, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Maldives ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 91st and Maldives ranks 93rd of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 | 83.15 | 0.1453 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 82.29 | 82.24 | 0.0553 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Costa Rica or Maldives?
- Costa Rica, at 82.01 against 81.89 in Maldives as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Costa Rica and Maldives?
- 0.12, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Maldives?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Costa Rica and Maldives rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Costa Rica ranks 91st and Maldives ranks 93rd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.