Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Insufficiently active
Costa Rica
82.01
in 2016
Lebanon
82.06
in 2016
Costa Rica rank
91st
Lebanon rank
90th
Insufficiently active over time
- Costa Rica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 82.06 against 82.01 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 91st and Lebanon ranks 90th of 132 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 | 82.76 | 0.2449 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 82.29 | 82.28 | 0.0133 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Costa Rica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 82.06 against 82.01 in Costa Rica as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 0.05, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Costa Rica and Lebanon rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Costa Rica ranks 91st and Lebanon ranks 90th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.