China vs Grenada: Insufficiently active

China
84.27
in 2016
Grenada
84.3
in 2016
China rank
63rd
Grenada rank
61st

Insufficiently active over time

  • China
  • Grenada
020406080200120082016

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 84.3 against 84.27 in China, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was China ahead.

China ranks 63rd and Grenada ranks 61st of 132 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 85.08 84.48 0.6021 China
2010s 84.5 84.35 0.1505 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher insufficiently active, China or Grenada?
Grenada, at 84.3 against 84.27 in China as of 2016.
What is the difference in insufficiently active between China and Grenada?
0.03, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Grenada?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do China and Grenada rank globally for insufficiently active?
China ranks 63rd and Grenada ranks 61st of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Insufficiently active (crude estimate)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
144 places, 2,304 data points, 2001–2016
Last refreshed