Cambodia vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Cambodia
91.58
in 2016
Western Pacific (WHO region)
85.78
in 2016
Cambodia rank
3rd
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
2nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Cambodia
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 91.58 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 5.8.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 3rd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.67 | 85.97 | 4.71 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 91.33 | 85.9 | 5.44 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Cambodia or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Cambodia, at 91.58 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Cambodia and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 5.8, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Cambodia and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Cambodia ranks 3rd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.