Botswana vs Namibia: Insufficiently active
Botswana
87.48
in 2016
Namibia
87.42
in 2016
Botswana rank
17th
Namibia rank
20th
Insufficiently active over time
- Botswana
- Namibia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 87.48 against 87.42 in Namibia, a difference of 0.06.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.35 | 87.29 | 0.0503 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 87.44 | 87.38 | 0.0588 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Botswana or Namibia?
- Botswana, at 87.48 against 87.42 in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Botswana and Namibia?
- 0.06, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Botswana ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 20th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.