Bhutan vs China: Insufficiently active

Bhutan
84.07
in 2016
China
84.27
in 2016
Bhutan rank
64th
China rank
63rd

Insufficiently active over time

  • Bhutan
  • China
020406080200120082016

How they compare

China currently reports 84.27 against 84.07 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.2.

Across all 16 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 64th and China ranks 63rd of 132 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan China Difference Ahead
2000s 83.67 85.08 1.4 China
2010s 83.97 84.5 0.5332 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher insufficiently active, Bhutan or China?
China, at 84.27 against 84.07 in Bhutan as of 2016.
What is the difference in insufficiently active between Bhutan and China?
0.2, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and China?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do Bhutan and China rank globally for insufficiently active?
Bhutan ranks 64th and China ranks 63rd of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs China: Insufficiently active. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/insufficiently-active-crude-estimate/bhutan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/insufficiently-active-crude-estimate/bhutan/china/">Bhutan vs China: Insufficiently active</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Insufficiently active (crude estimate)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
145 places, 2,320 data points, 2001–2016
Last refreshed