Barbados vs Tunisia: Insufficiently active
Barbados
81.76
in 2016
Tunisia
81.49
in 2016
Barbados rank
94th
Tunisia rank
95th
Insufficiently active over time
- Barbados
- Tunisia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 81.76 against 81.49 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.27.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 132 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.87 | 82.53 | 0.3426 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 82.08 | 81.77 | 0.3073 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Barbados or Tunisia?
- Barbados, at 81.76 against 81.49 in Tunisia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Barbados and Tunisia?
- 0.27, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Tunisia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Barbados and Tunisia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Barbados ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.