Barbados vs Maldives: Insufficiently active
Barbados
81.76
in 2016
Maldives
81.89
in 2016
Barbados rank
94th
Maldives rank
93rd
Insufficiently active over time
- Barbados
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 81.89 against 81.76 in Barbados, a difference of 0.13.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 94th and Maldives ranks 93rd of 132 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.87 | 83.15 | 0.2806 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 82.08 | 82.24 | 0.1563 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Barbados or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 81.89 against 81.76 in Barbados as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Barbados and Maldives?
- 0.13, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Maldives?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Barbados and Maldives rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Barbados ranks 94th and Maldives ranks 93rd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.