Barbados vs Costa Rica: Insufficiently active
Barbados
81.76
in 2016
Costa Rica
82.01
in 2016
Barbados rank
94th
Costa Rica rank
91st
Insufficiently active over time
- Barbados
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 82.01 against 81.76 in Barbados, a difference of 0.25.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 94th and Costa Rica ranks 91st of 132 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.87 | 83 | 0.1353 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 82.08 | 82.29 | 0.2117 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Barbados or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 82.01 against 81.76 in Barbados as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Barbados and Costa Rica?
- 0.25, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Costa Rica?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Barbados and Costa Rica rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Barbados ranks 94th and Costa Rica ranks 91st of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.