Australia vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 89.27 against 89.02 in Australia, a difference of 0.25.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 88.68 | 1.1 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 89.11 | 0.4768 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 89.27 against 89.02 in Australia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and Zambia?
- 0.25, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.