Australia vs East Timor: Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
East Timor
89.37
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
East Timor rank
5th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 89.37 against 89.02 in Australia, a difference of 0.35.
Across all 16 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and East Timor ranks 5th of 132 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 89.09 | 1.51 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 89.28 | 0.6458 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 89.37 against 89.02 in Australia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and East Timor?
- 0.35, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and East Timor?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and East Timor rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and East Timor ranks 5th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.