Australia vs Sudan: Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
Sudan rank
4th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 89.02 in Australia, a difference of 1.28.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 4th of 132 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 89.57 | 1.99 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 90.11 | 1.47 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 89.02 in Australia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and Sudan?
- 1.28, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Sudan rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 4th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.