Australia vs Lower-middle income (World Bank): Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
Lower-middle income (World Bank)
79.26
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
Lower-middle income (World Bank) rank
10th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- Lower-middle income (World Bank)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 89.02 against 79.26 in Lower-middle income (World Bank), a difference of 9.76.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Lower-middle income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 10th of 132 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Lower-middle income (World Bank) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 80.38 | 7.2 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 79.56 | 9.08 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
- Australia, at 89.02 against 79.26 in Lower-middle income (World Bank) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
- 9.76, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Lower-middle income (World Bank) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 10th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.