Australia vs Italy: Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
Italy
88.62
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
Italy rank
10th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- Italy
How they compare
Australia currently reports 89.02 against 88.62 in Italy, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Italy ranks 10th of 130 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 87.2 | 0.3803 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 88.25 | 0.386 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or Italy?
- Australia, at 89.02 against 88.62 in Italy as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and Italy?
- 0.4, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Italy?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Italy rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and Italy ranks 10th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.