Australia vs Europe (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Australia
89.02
in 2016
Europe (WHO region)
82.12
in 2016
Australia rank
7th
Europe (WHO region) rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Australia
- Europe (WHO region)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 89.02 against 82.12 in Europe (WHO region), a difference of 6.9.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Europe (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Europe (WHO region) ranks 6th of 132 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Europe (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.58 | 82.08 | 5.5 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.63 | 82.1 | 6.53 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Australia or Europe (WHO region)?
- Australia, at 89.02 against 82.12 in Europe (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Australia and Europe (WHO region)?
- 6.9, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Europe (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Europe (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Australia ranks 7th and Europe (WHO region) ranks 6th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.