Americas (WHO region) vs New Zealand: Insufficiently active
Americas (WHO region)
80.67
in 2016
New Zealand
88.74
in 2016
Americas (WHO region) rank
8th
New Zealand rank
9th
Insufficiently active over time
- Americas (WHO region)
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.74 against 80.67 in Americas (WHO region), a difference of 8.07.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Americas (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Americas (WHO region) ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 11 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas (WHO region) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.62 | 87.61 | 5.99 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 80.95 | 88.44 | 7.49 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Americas (WHO region) or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 88.74 against 80.67 in Americas (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Americas (WHO region) and New Zealand?
- 8.07, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas (WHO region) and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Americas (WHO region) and New Zealand rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Americas (WHO region) ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.