Africa (WHO region) vs Timor-Leste: Insufficiently active
Africa (WHO region)
85.4
in 2016
Timor-Leste
89.37
in 2016
Africa (WHO region) rank
3rd
Timor-Leste rank
5th
Insufficiently active over time
- Africa (WHO region)
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 89.37 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region), a difference of 3.97.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 5th of 11 groups.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa (WHO region) | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.83 | 89.09 | 3.26 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 85.53 | 89.28 | 3.75 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Africa (WHO region) or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 89.37 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Africa (WHO region) and Timor-Leste?
- 3.97, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa (WHO region) and Timor-Leste?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Africa (WHO region) and Timor-Leste rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 5th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.