Africa (WHO region) vs Sudan: Insufficiently active
Africa (WHO region)
85.4
in 2016
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Africa (WHO region) rank
3rd
Sudan rank
4th
Insufficiently active over time
- Africa (WHO region)
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region), a difference of 4.9.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Africa (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Sudan ranks 4th of 11 groups.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa (WHO region) | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.83 | 89.57 | 3.74 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 85.53 | 90.11 | 4.58 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Africa (WHO region) or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Africa (WHO region) and Sudan?
- 4.9, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa (WHO region) and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Africa (WHO region) and Sudan rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Sudan ranks 4th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.