Africa (WHO region) vs Republic of Korea: Insufficiently active
Africa (WHO region)
85.4
in 2016
Republic of Korea
94.18
in 2016
Africa (WHO region) rank
3rd
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Insufficiently active over time
- Africa (WHO region)
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 94.18 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region), a difference of 8.78.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Africa (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa (WHO region) | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.83 | 93.13 | 7.3 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 85.53 | 93.9 | 8.38 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Africa (WHO region) or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 94.18 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Africa (WHO region) and Republic of Korea?
- 8.78, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa (WHO region) and Republic of Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Africa (WHO region) and Republic of Korea rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.