Africa (WHO region) vs Cambodia: Insufficiently active
Africa (WHO region)
85.4
in 2016
Cambodia
91.58
in 2016
Africa (WHO region) rank
3rd
Cambodia rank
3rd
Insufficiently active over time
- Africa (WHO region)
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 91.58 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region), a difference of 6.18.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Africa (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Cambodia ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa (WHO region) | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.83 | 90.67 | 4.84 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 85.53 | 91.33 | 5.8 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Africa (WHO region) or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 91.58 against 85.4 in Africa (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Africa (WHO region) and Cambodia?
- 6.18, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa (WHO region) and Cambodia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Africa (WHO region) and Cambodia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Africa (WHO region) ranks 3rd and Cambodia ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.