Nauru vs Tanzania: Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people)
Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people) over time
- Nauru
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 172 per 100,000 people against 161 per 100,000 people in Nauru, a difference of 11 per 100,000 people.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 44th and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 208 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.3 per 100,000 people | 497 per 100,000 people | 440.7 per 100,000 people | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 73.3 per 100,000 people | 322 per 100,000 people | 248.7 per 100,000 people | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 153 per 100,000 people | 196 per 100,000 people | 43 per 100,000 people | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher incidence of tuberculosis, Nauru or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 172 per 100,000 people against 161 per 100,000 people in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in incidence of tuberculosis between Nauru and Tanzania?
- 11 per 100,000 people, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tanzania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Tanzania rank globally for incidence of tuberculosis?
- Nauru ranks 44th and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Incidence of tuberculosis is the estimated number of new and relapse tuberculosis cases arising in a given year, expressed as the rate per 100,000 population. All forms of TB are included, including cases in people living with HIV. Estimates for all years are recalculated as new information becomes available and techniques are refined, so they may differ from those published previously.