Brazil vs China: Incidence of tuberculosis
Incidence of tuberculosis over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 49 per 100,000 people against 49 per 100,000 people in China, a difference of 0 per 100,000 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 92nd and China ranks 92nd of 208 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.1 per 100,000 people | 92.9 per 100,000 people | 45.8 per 100,000 people | China |
| 2010s | 42.4 per 100,000 people | 67 per 100,000 people | 24.6 per 100,000 people | China |
| 2020s | 47.8 per 100,000 people | 53.2 per 100,000 people | 5.4 per 100,000 people | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher incidence of tuberculosis, Brazil or China?
- Brazil, at 49 per 100,000 people against 49 per 100,000 people in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in incidence of tuberculosis between Brazil and China?
- 0 per 100,000 people, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for incidence of tuberculosis?
- Brazil ranks 92nd and China ranks 92nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Incidence of tuberculosis is the estimated number of new and relapse tuberculosis cases arising in a given year, expressed as the rate per 100,000 population. All forms of TB are included, including cases in people living with HIV. Estimates for all years are recalculated as new information becomes available and techniques are refined, so they may differ from those published previously.