Sur vs Tuvalu: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
Sur
78.0%
in 2025
Tuvalu
99.0%
in 2025
Sur rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- Sur
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 99.0% against 78.0% in Sur, a difference of 21.0%.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.3 times Sur's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.4% | 99.0% | 17.6% | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 77.5% | 99.0% | 21.5% | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, Sur or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 99.0% against 78.0% in Sur as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between Sur and Tuvalu?
- 21.0%, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tuvalu?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Sur and Tuvalu rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- Sur ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.