SEAR vs Uzbekistan: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
SEAR
94.0%
in 2025
Uzbekistan
99.0%
in 2025
SEAR rank
2nd
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- SEAR
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was SEAR ahead.
SEAR ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, SEAR averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SEAR | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.6% | 30.0% | 22.6% | SEAR |
| 2020s | 89.5% | 97.0% | 7.5% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, SEAR or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between SEAR and Uzbekistan?
- 5.0%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SEAR and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do SEAR and Uzbekistan rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- SEAR ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.