SEAR vs Tuvalu: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
SEAR
94.0%
in 2025
Tuvalu
99.0%
in 2025
SEAR rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- SEAR
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
SEAR ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SEAR | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.6% | 99.0% | 46.4% | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 89.5% | 99.0% | 9.5% | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, SEAR or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between SEAR and Tuvalu?
- 5.0%, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SEAR and Tuvalu?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do SEAR and Tuvalu rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- SEAR ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.