Palau vs SEAR: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
Palau
99.0%
in 2025
SEAR
94.0%
in 2025
Palau rank
1st
SEAR rank
2nd
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- Palau
- SEAR
How they compare
Palau currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Palau ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.2% | 52.6% | 45.6% | Palau |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 89.5% | 9.5% | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, Palau or SEAR?
- Palau, at 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between Palau and SEAR?
- 5.0%, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and SEAR?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Palau and SEAR rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- Palau ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.